Study design: ERIVANCE was a Phase II, international, single-arm, 2-cohort, open-label trial5,6
Conducted in 104 patients with either metastatic BCC (n=33) or locally advanced BCC (n=71).
Of the 104 patients enrolled, 96 patients were evaluable for objective response rate (ORR).
Patients were seen at baseline and every 4 weeks for safety monitoring
Patients were seen at baseline and every 8 weeks for response assessment
ORR as assessed by independent review. See assessment criteria below for locally advanced BCC and metastatic BCC cohorts.
21% of patients had a preexisting diagnosis of Gorlin syndrome and met the inclusion criteria for advanced BCC.
Age |
Locally advanced BCC (n=63) |
Metastatic BCC (n=33) |
All evaluable patients (N=96) |
Median |
62 years |
62 years |
62 years |
(Range) |
(21-101) |
(38-92) |
(21-101) |
Gender |
|||
Female |
44% |
27% |
39% |
Male |
56% |
73% |
61% |
Race |
|||
% White |
100% |
100% |
100% |
Prior cancer treatment |
|||
Any therapy |
94% |
97% |
|
Surgery |
89% |
97% |
|
Radiotherapy |
27% |
58% |
|
Systemic therapy |
11% (systemics/topicals) |
30% (systemics) |
Assessment of objective response in locally advanced BCC5,6
A composite endpoint was used to assess response.
Primary endpoint: Locally advanced BCC ORR by independent review
Patients received at least 1 dose of Erivedge with independent pathologist-confirmed diagnosis of BCC. Locally advanced BCC patients were considered responders if they did not experience progression and had ≥30% reduction in lesion size (sum of the longest diameter) from baseline in target lesions by radiography or in externally visible dimensions of target lesions (scar tissue was measured); or had complete resolution of ulceration in all target lesions. Complete response was objective response with no residual BCC on sampling biopsy. Partial response was objective response with presence of residual BCC on sampling biopsy.
CI=confidence interval; ORR=objective response rate.
Response is confirmed if present on 2 consecutive radiographic scans ≥4 weeks apart
Erivedge was the first FDA-approved therapy for metastatic BCC2
Patients received at least 1 dose of Erivedge with independent pathologist-confirmed diagnosis of BCC. In the metastatic BCC cohort, response was assessed according to RECIST version 1.0. Complete response was disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. Partial response was ≥30% decrease in SLD of target lesions from baseline.
CI=confidence interval; ORR=objective response rate; RECIST=Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; SLD=sum of the longest diameter.
All advanced BCC patients (N=138) |
|||||
Adverse reactions occurring in ≥10% of advanced BCC patients |
Grade 1 (%) (Mild) |
Grade 2 (%) (Moderate) |
Grade 3 (%) (Severe) |
Grade 4 (%) (Disabling or life-threatening) |
All grades (%) |
Muscle spasms |
51.4% |
16.7% |
3.6% |
- |
72% |
Alopecia |
49.3% |
14.5% |
N/A |
N/A |
64% |
Change in taste (dysgeusia) |
34.1% |
21.0% |
N/A |
N/A |
55% |
Weight loss |
25.4% |
12.3% |
7% |
N/A |
45% |
Fatigue |
27.5% |
6.5% |
5% |
0.7% |
40% |
Nausea |
23.9% |
5.8% |
0.7% |
- |
30% |
Diarrhea |
21.7% |
6.5% |
0.7% |
- |
29% |
Decreased appetite |
15.2% |
8.0% |
2.2% |
- |
25% |
Constipations |
17.4% |
3.6% |
- |
- |
21% |
Arthralgias |
11.6% |
3.6% |
0.7% |
- |
16% |
Vomiting |
10.9% |
2.9% |
- |
- |
14% |
Loss of taste (ageusia) |
8.0% |
2.9% |
N/A |
N/A |
11% |
Adverse reactions reported using Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities preferred terms and graded using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0 for assessment of toxicity.
N/A=not applicable, this grade does not exist for this adverse reaction.
Overview |
Single-arm, international, open-label, post-approval study to fulfill a European post-marketing commitment |
Primary objective |
Safety |
Safety-evaluable patients (n) |
1215† (laBCC: n=1119; mBCC: n=96) |
Median age (range) |
72 years (18-101) |
% White |
72.4 |
% Male |
57.1 |
Treatment |
Oral Erivedge 150 mg daily until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or withdrawal from study |
Median duration of treatment |
8.6 months |
Treatment interruptions |
|
Study limitations |
Absence of a control arm and lack of independent central review |
466 patients from STEVIE were analyzed for the time to resolution after treatment discontinuation for each of the adverse reactions. This was the population still experiencing adverse reactions at the time of discontinuation and who completed the 12-month follow-up visit. Median follow-up after treatment discontinuation of 12.1 months (range, 10.0 to 17.6 months).1
Limitations: Because clinical trials are conducted under widely varying conditions, time to onset and resolution of adverse reactions observed in the clinical trials of a drug cannot be directly compared to those observed in other clinical trials of that drug and may not reflect actual clinical practice. This endpoint is exploratory and no formal inferences can be drawn.
Limitations: Because clinical trials are conducted under widely varying conditions, duration of treatment, number of treatment interruptions, and duration of treatment interruption observed in the clinical trial of a drug may not reflect actual clinical practice. This endpoint is exploratory and post-hoc, and no formal inferences can be drawn. Treatment interruption data are not exclusively a result of adverse reactions. The patients captured do not include the total population who took treatment interruptions due to incomplete dosing information for some patients.
*From final data cut June 14, 2017.26
†Patients who received at least 1 dose of Erivedge.
Erivedge capsule was approved based on the pivotal ERIVANCE trial—a Phase II, single-arm, 2-cohort, multicenter study that demonstrated clinically meaningful benefit in advanced basal cell carcinoma (BCC). The study conducted an initial primary analysis by independent review at 9 months minimum follow-up and a final, long-term analysis at 39 months minimum follow-up as assessed by investigator.
All treated patients were considered evaluable for safety. Safety analyses included frequency and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), adverse events leading to treatment interruption or discontinuation, serious adverse events, and death. The incidence of these adverse events generally increased with longer durations of exposure to Erivedge.
TEAE occurring in >20% of patients, n (%)* |
Exposure <12 months (n=48) |
Exposure ≥12 months (n=56) |
||
Any Grade |
Grade 3† |
Any Grade |
Grade 3† |
|
Any AE |
48 (100.0) |
27 (56.3) |
56 (100.0) |
31 (55.4) |
Muscle spasms |
25 (52.1) |
2 (4.2) |
49 (87.5) |
4 (7.1) |
Alopecia |
24 (50.0) |
N/A |
45 (80.4) |
N/A |
Dysgeusia |
20 (41.7) |
N/A |
38 (67.9) |
N/A |
Weight decreased |
18 (37.5) |
0 |
36 (64.3) |
9 (16.1) |
Fatigue |
17 (35.4) |
4 (8.3) |
28 (50.0) |
1 (1.8) |
Nausea |
11 (22.9) |
0 |
23 (41.1) |
0 |
Decreased appetite |
15 (31.3) |
2 (4.2) |
14 (25.0) |
1 (1.8) |
Diarrhea |
10 (20.8) |
0 |
18 (32.1) |
3 (5.4) |
Constipation |
10 (20.8) |
0 |
10 (17.9) |
0 |
Cough |
8 (16.7) |
0 |
12 (21.4) |
0 |
Arthralgia |
5 (10.4) |
0 |
12 (21.4) |
1 (1.8) |
*Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities–preferred term.
†NCI CTCAE, National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0.
AE=adverse event; NA=not applicable.
The study conducted an initial primary analysis by independent review at 9 month’s minimum follow-up and a final, long-term analysis by investigator at 39 month’s minimum follow-up. The primary endpoint was ORR as assessed by independent review. Select secondary endpoints included investigator-assessed ORR, as well as independent review and investigator-assessed DOR and safety.6 Of the 104 patients enrolled, 96 were evaluable for ORR.5
Limitations: absence of a control arm6
Independent review5† |
Investigator assessment‡ secondary endpoint |
|||
Locally advanced BCC (n=63) |
Metastatic BCC (n=33) |
Locally advanced BCC (n=63) |
Metastatic BCC (n=33) |
|
ORR | 42.9%† (n=27) primary endpoint |
30.3%† (n=10) primary endpoint |
60.3% (n=38) | 45.5% (n=15) |
(95% CI) |
(30.5-56.0) |
(15.6-48.2) |
(47.2-71.7) |
(28.1-62.2) |
Complete response |
20.6% (n=13) |
0% (n=0) |
31.7% (n=20) |
0% (n=0) |
Partial response |
22.2% (n=14) |
30.3% (n=10) |
28.6% (n=18) |
45.5% (n=15) |
Median DOR (months) |
7.6 |
7.6 |
7.6 |
12.9 |
(95% CI) |
(5.7-9.7) |
(5.6-NE) |
(7.4-NE) |
(5.6-12.9) |
*The median duration of treatment was 10.2 months (range, 0.7 to 18.7 months).5
†Patients received at least 1 dose of Erivedge with independent pathologist-confirmed diagnosis of BCC. Locally advanced BCC patients were considered responders if they did not experience progression and had 30% reduction in lesion size (sum of the longest diameter) from baseline in target lesions by radiography or in externally visible dimensions of target lesions (scar tissue was measured); or had complete resolution of ulceration in all target lesions. Complete response was objective response with no residual BCC on sampling biopsy. Partial response was objective response with presence of residual BCC on sampling biopsy. In the metastatic BCC cohort, response was assessed according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.0. Complete response was disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. Partial response was 30% decrease in SLD of target lesions from baseline. The primary endpoint was the independently assessed objective response rate.5
‡Concordance between IRF and INV assessment of ORR was 79% for mBCC and 60% for laBCC due to investigator's assessing a response and IRF not assessing a response.
INV=investigator; IRF=independent review facility; NE=not estimable.
Investigator-assessed ORR and DOR. For the final follow-up at 39 months, all assessments were secondary endpoints as assessed by investigators. 69 patients remained in the survival follow-up (96 patients had discontinued treatment).‖
Limitations: absence of a control arm and lack of independent assessment5
Investigator assessment |
||
Locally advanced BCC (n=63) |
Metastatic BCC (n=33) |
|
ORR |
60.3% (n=38) |
48.5% (n=16) |
(95% CI) |
(47.2-71.7) |
(30.8-66.2) |
Complete response |
31.7% (n=20) |
0% (n=0) |
Partial response |
28.6% (n=18) |
48.5% (n=16) |
Median DOR (months) |
26.2 |
14.8 |
(95% CI) |
(9.0-37.6) |
(5.6-17.0) |
§Overall, median duration of treatment on Erivedge was 12.9 months.
‖Primary reasons for discontinuation: disease progression (27.9%), patient decision (26%), adverse reactions (21.2%), and other reasons (17.5%).
Because different standards are used for independent review and investigator assessment, no formal treatment comparisons can be made.
Read about possible side effects of Erivedge and get ideas on how to manage them.
Data on file. Genentech, Inc.
Data on file. Genentech, Inc.
FDA approves Erivedge (vismodegib) capsule, the first medicine for adults with advanced basal cell carcinoma [press release]. San Francisco, CA: Genentech, Inc.; January 30, 2012.
FDA approves Erivedge (vismodegib) capsule, the first medicine for adults with advanced basal cell carcinoma [press release]. San Francisco, CA: Genentech, Inc.; January 30, 2012.
Epstein EH. Basal cell carcinomas: attack of the hedgehog. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8(10):743-754.
Epstein EH. Basal cell carcinomas: attack of the hedgehog. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8(10):743-754.
Scales SJ, de Sauvage FJ. Mechanisms of Hedgehog pathway activation in cancer and implications for therapy. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2009;30(6):303-312.
Scales SJ, de Sauvage FJ. Mechanisms of Hedgehog pathway activation in cancer and implications for therapy. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2009;30(6):303-312.
Erivedge® (vismodegib) capsule Prescribing Information. Genentech, Inc. March 2023.
Erivedge® (vismodegib) capsule Prescribing Information. Genentech, Inc. March 2023.
Sekulic A, Migden MR, Oro AE, et al. Efficacy and safety of vismodegib in advanced basal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(23):2171-2179.
Sekulic A, Migden MR, Oro AE, et al. Efficacy and safety of vismodegib in advanced basal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(23):2171-2179.
Von Hoff DD, LoRusso PM, Rudin CM, et al. Inhibition of the hedgehog pathway in advanced basal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(12):1164-1172.
Von Hoff DD, LoRusso PM, Rudin CM, et al. Inhibition of the hedgehog pathway in advanced basal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(12):1164-1172.
LoRusso PM, Rudin CM, Reddy JC, et al. Phase I trial of hedgehog pathway inhibitor vismodegib (GDC-0449) in patients with refractory, locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17(8):2502-2511.
LoRusso PM, Rudin CM, Reddy JC, et al. Phase I trial of hedgehog pathway inhibitor vismodegib (GDC-0449) in patients with refractory, locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17(8):2502-2511.
Gupta S, Takebe N, LoRusso P. Targeting the hedgehog pathway in cancer. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2010;2(4):237-250.
Gupta S, Takebe N, LoRusso P. Targeting the hedgehog pathway in cancer. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2010;2(4):237-250.
Cancer.org. How Targeted Therapies Are Used to Treat Cancer. https://www.cancer.org/treatment/treatments-and-side-effects/treatment-types/targeted-therapy/what-is.html. Accessed April 26, 2022.
Cancer.org. How Targeted Therapies Are Used to Treat Cancer. https://www.cancer.org/treatment/treatments-and-side-effects/treatment-types/targeted-therapy/what-is.html. Accessed April 26, 2022.
Lear JT, Corner C, Dziewulski P, et al. Challenges and new horizons in the management of advanced basal cell carcinoma: a UK perspective. Br J Cancer. 2014;111(8):1476-1481.
Lear JT, Corner C, Dziewulski P, et al. Challenges and new horizons in the management of advanced basal cell carcinoma: a UK perspective. Br J Cancer. 2014;111(8):1476-1481.
Ibrahim SF. Advanced basal cell carcinoma: treatment overview. The Dermatologist. 2014;22(3). https://www.hmpgloballearningnetwork.com/site/thederm/site/cathlab/event/advamced-basa-cell-carcinoma-treatment-overview. Published March 10, 2014. Accessed February 24, 2023.
Ibrahim SF. Advanced basal cell carcinoma: treatment overview. The Dermatologist. 2014;22(3). https://www.hmpgloballearningnetwork.com/site/thederm/site/cathlab/event/advamced-basa-cell-carcinoma-treatment-overview. Published March 10, 2014. Accessed February 24, 2023.
Levine A, Markowitz O. Update on advanced basal cell carcinoma diagnosis and treatment. Dermatology Times. https://www.dermatologytimes.com/view/update-advanced-basal-cell-carcinoma-diagnosis-and-treatment. Accessed March 29, 2023.
Levine A, Markowitz O. Update on advanced basal cell carcinoma diagnosis and treatment. Dermatology Times. https://www.dermatologytimes.com/view/update-advanced-basal-cell-carcinoma-diagnosis-and-treatment. Accessed March 29, 2023.
Amin SP, Russell KJ. Diagnosing, managing aBCC in elderly patients. Dermatology Times. https://www.dermatologytimes.com/view/diagnosing-managing-abcc-elderly-patients. Accessed March 29, 2023.
Amin SP, Russell KJ. Diagnosing, managing aBCC in elderly patients. Dermatology Times. https://www.dermatologytimes.com/view/diagnosing-managing-abcc-elderly-patients. Accessed March 29, 2023.
Erivedge® (vismodegib) capsule European Medicines Agency Assessment Report. September 15, 2016.
Erivedge® (vismodegib) capsule European Medicines Agency Assessment Report. September 15, 2016.
Lacouture ME, Dréno B, Ascierto PA, et al. Characterization and management of hedgehog pathway inhibitor-related adverse events in patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma. Oncologist. 2016;21(10):1218-1229.
Lacouture ME, Dréno B, Ascierto PA, et al. Characterization and management of hedgehog pathway inhibitor-related adverse events in patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma. Oncologist. 2016;21(10):1218-1229.
National Cancer Institute. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v3.0. https://ctep.cancer.gov/protocoldevelopment/electronic_applications/docs/ctcaev3.pdf. Accessed August 26, 2022.
National Cancer Institute. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v3.0. https://ctep.cancer.gov/protocoldevelopment/electronic_applications/docs/ctcaev3.pdf. Accessed August 26, 2022.
Solomon JA, Chever D, Iarrobino A, Caldwell C. Successful control of adverse events associated with vismodegib treatment of advanced basal cell carcinoma by recognition of hedgehog pathway activity in normal adult tissue. Poster presented at: International Investigative Dermatology Meeting; May 8-11, 2013; Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom. Abstract 1088.
Solomon JA, Chever D, Iarrobino A, Caldwell C. Successful control of adverse events associated with vismodegib treatment of advanced basal cell carcinoma by recognition of hedgehog pathway activity in normal adult tissue. Poster presented at: International Investigative Dermatology Meeting; May 8-11, 2013; Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom. Abstract 1088.
Sekulic A, Migden MR, Lewis K, et al. Pivotal ERIVANCE basal cell carcinoma (BCC) study: 12-month update of efficacy and safety of vismodegib in advanced BCC. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;72(6):1021-1026.
Sekulic A, Migden MR, Lewis K, et al. Pivotal ERIVANCE basal cell carcinoma (BCC) study: 12-month update of efficacy and safety of vismodegib in advanced BCC. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;72(6):1021-1026.
Fife K, Herd R, Lalondrelle S, et al. Managing adverse events associated with vismodegib in the treatment of basal cell carcinoma. Future Oncol. 2017;13(2):175-184.
Fife K, Herd R, Lalondrelle S, et al. Managing adverse events associated with vismodegib in the treatment of basal cell carcinoma. Future Oncol. 2017;13(2):175-184.
Ibrahim SF. Treating advanced basal cell carcinoma. https://www.the-dermatologist.com/content/treating-advanced-basal-cell-carcinoma. Accessed April 26, 2022.
Ibrahim SF. Treating advanced basal cell carcinoma. https://www.the-dermatologist.com/content/treating-advanced-basal-cell-carcinoma. Accessed April 26, 2022.
Le Moigne M, Saint-Jean M, Jirka A, et al. Dysgeusia and weight loss under treatment with vismodegib: benefit of nutritional management. Support Care Cancer. 2016;24(4):1689-1695.
Le Moigne M, Saint-Jean M, Jirka A, et al. Dysgeusia and weight loss under treatment with vismodegib: benefit of nutritional management. Support Care Cancer. 2016;24(4):1689-1695.
Sekulic A, Migden MR, Basset-Séguin N, et al; for the ERIVANCE BCC Investigators. Long-term safety and efficacy of vismodegib in patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma: final update of the pivotal ERIVANCE BCC study. BMC Cancer. 2017;17(1):332. doi:10.1186/s12885-017-3286-5.
Sekulic A, Migden MR, Basset-Séguin N, et al; for the ERIVANCE BCC Investigators. Long-term safety and efficacy of vismodegib in patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma: final update of the pivotal ERIVANCE BCC study. BMC Cancer. 2017;17(1):332. doi:10.1186/s12885-017-3286-5.
Mohan SV, Chang AL. Management of cutaneous and extracutaneous side effects of smoothened inhibitor therapy for advanced basal cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21(12):2677-2683.
Mohan SV, Chang AL. Management of cutaneous and extracutaneous side effects of smoothened inhibitor therapy for advanced basal cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21(12):2677-2683.
American Society of Clinical Oncology. Appetite Loss. https://www.cancer.net/coping-with-cancer/physical-emotional-and-social-effects-cancer/managing-physical-side-effects/appetite-loss. Accessed April 26, 2022.
American Society of Clinical Oncology. Appetite Loss. https://www.cancer.net/coping-with-cancer/physical-emotional-and-social-effects-cancer/managing-physical-side-effects/appetite-loss. Accessed April 26, 2022.
Basset-Séguin N, Hauschild A, Kunstfeld R, et al. Vismodegib in patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma: primary analysis of STEVIE, an international, open-label trial. Eur J Cancer. 2017;86:334-348.
Basset-Séguin N, Hauschild A, Kunstfeld R, et al. Vismodegib in patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma: primary analysis of STEVIE, an international, open-label trial. Eur J Cancer. 2017;86:334-348.
Ozgur OK, Yin V, Chou E, et al. Hedgehog pathway inhibition for locally advanced periocular basal cell carcinoma and basal cell nevus syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015;160(2):220-227.e2. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2015.04.040
Ozgur OK, Yin V, Chou E, et al. Hedgehog pathway inhibition for locally advanced periocular basal cell carcinoma and basal cell nevus syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015;160(2):220-227.e2. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2015.04.040
Clinicaltrials.gov. STEVIE: A Study of Vismodegib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Basal Cell Carcinoma. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01367665. Accessed August 30, 2022.
Clinicaltrials.gov. STEVIE: A Study of Vismodegib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Basal Cell Carcinoma. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01367665. Accessed August 30, 2022.
National Cancer Institute. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0. https://evs.nci.nih.gov/ftp1/CTCAE/CTCAE_4.03/CTCAE_4.03_2010-06-14_QuickReference_5x7.pdf. Accessed August 30, 2022.
National Cancer Institute. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0. https://evs.nci.nih.gov/ftp1/CTCAE/CTCAE_4.03/CTCAE_4.03_2010-06-14_QuickReference_5x7.pdf. Accessed August 30, 2022.
Erivedge® (vismodegib) capsule European Medicines Agency Assessment Report. September 15, 2016.
Erivedge® (vismodegib) capsule European Medicines Agency Assessment Report. September 15, 2016.
The information contained in this section of the site is intended for U.S. healthcare professionals only. Click "OK" if you are a healthcare professional.
The link you have selected will take you away from this site to one that is not owned or controlled by Genentech, Inc. Genentech, Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information contained on sites we do not own or control. Genentech does not recommend and does not endorse the content on any third-party websites. Your use of third-party websites is at your own risk and subject to the terms and conditions of use for such sites.